There are no Cons, just looks like a normal interior with 2+1What do think about back seats. 2 +1 optional?
pro and cons
usability, aesthetics. Etc
Interesting. I’ve got that option as well but didn’t think it may help resale. I can’t see me ever having more that 3 passengers in the car.For the UK market it was an option that the salesguy told me I must tick for resale.
It's certainly a personal preference, and a very inexpensive option. I opted no for the following reasons. The middle seating surface is almost identical, just a slightly (maybe a couple inches?) longer seating surface, and a headrest. The middle seat does affect both other rear seats. They no longer match the front seats in pattern, and there is a 'pesky' seat belt for the middle seat that intrudes on the driver side rear seat. The headrest slightly obscures the poor rear view, and you lose the armrest and cupholder for the rear seat passengers. I don't ever anticipate having 5 people in the car, and if I do, it will be for a very short distance, and they can fit in just as well - of course without seatbelt or headrest...I first wanted to spec this option as well. Why not. More flexible. But then I thought It'd make the interior look worse for something that I didn't know when I'd use.
thank youIt's certainly a personal preference, and a very inexpensive option. I opted no for the following reasons. The middle seating surface is almost identical, just a slightly (maybe a couple inches?) longer seating surface, and a headrest. The middle seat does affect both other rear seats. They no longer match the front seats in pattern, and there is a 'pesky' seat belt for the middle seat that intrudes on the driver side rear seat. The headrest slightly obscures the poor rear view, and you lose the armrest and cupholder for the rear seat passengers. I don't ever anticipate having 5 people in the car, and if I do, it will be for a very short distance, and they can fit in just as well - of course without seatbelt or headrest...
I have the 2+1 option...........You do not lose the armrest and rear seat cupholder in the rearIt's certainly a personal preference, and a very inexpensive option. I opted no for the following reasons. The middle seating surface is almost identical, just a slightly (maybe a couple inches?) longer seating surface, and a headrest. The middle seat does affect both other rear seats. They no longer match the front seats in pattern, and there is a 'pesky' seat belt for the middle seat that intrudes on the driver side rear seat. The headrest slightly obscures the poor rear view, and you lose the armrest and cupholder for the rear seat passengers. I don't ever anticipate having 5 people in the car, and if I do, it will be for a very short distance, and they can fit in just as well - of course without seatbelt or headrest...