McgR
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2021
- Threads
- 34
- Messages
- 1,561
- Reaction score
- 1,385
- Location
- Belgium
- Vehicles
- Taycan CT 4
- Thread starter
- #1
https://www.p3-group.com/en/p3-char...ehicles-from-a-users-perspective-update-2021/
This is a really interesting for long distance driving potential . I have added the most interesting graphs at the end.
Fast charging capability, battery capacity and vehicle economy are all important for long distance driving. With a sufficient battery capacity, fast charging might even be more important. Also see the Out of spec video comparing Taycan, Tesla M3 / MX, Mach E and Ioniq 5.
Charge curves and average charge are more important than peak power. Taycan still performs best. Also see the thread on fast charging by Bjorn Nyland. Selecting economic charging might not be too bad. Save 270 kw charging for selected stops.
also interstating : 1000 km challenge. Don’t like it that het calls the CT the fat Taycan however.
Combining charging speed and driving economy gives a usable parameter: km charged in 20 minutes. Not convinced by the p3 index. Why 300 km? For the Taycan 250 would be better.
Best range at around 20 degrees celius
Taycan is the only one actual performing better than WLTP but still really high compared to others.
Discussion:
27 kWh/ 100 km is really high for the Taycan. They tested a Turbo, probably on 21 but stilI am around 23 and less for normal highway driving.
Availablity of fast chargers is also really important. And probably more availability during holiday. Big advantage for Tesla with stations with 30 chargers
Everything changes when charging strategy changes. With the Taycan the fastest way to travel might be to go between 60 and 10 SoC and short charges. Wouldn’t be good for battery longevity however.
At the end we didn’t buy the Taycan for economy but for driving fun. But still it appears to be a good long distance cruiser and most important a fantastic daily driver.
This is a really interesting for long distance driving potential . I have added the most interesting graphs at the end.
Fast charging capability, battery capacity and vehicle economy are all important for long distance driving. With a sufficient battery capacity, fast charging might even be more important. Also see the Out of spec video comparing Taycan, Tesla M3 / MX, Mach E and Ioniq 5.
Charge curves and average charge are more important than peak power. Taycan still performs best. Also see the thread on fast charging by Bjorn Nyland. Selecting economic charging might not be too bad. Save 270 kw charging for selected stops.
also interstating : 1000 km challenge. Don’t like it that het calls the CT the fat Taycan however.
Combining charging speed and driving economy gives a usable parameter: km charged in 20 minutes. Not convinced by the p3 index. Why 300 km? For the Taycan 250 would be better.
Best range at around 20 degrees celius
Taycan is the only one actual performing better than WLTP but still really high compared to others.
Discussion:
27 kWh/ 100 km is really high for the Taycan. They tested a Turbo, probably on 21 but stilI am around 23 and less for normal highway driving.
Availablity of fast chargers is also really important. And probably more availability during holiday. Big advantage for Tesla with stations with 30 chargers
Everything changes when charging strategy changes. With the Taycan the fastest way to travel might be to go between 60 and 10 SoC and short charges. Wouldn’t be good for battery longevity however.
At the end we didn’t buy the Taycan for economy but for driving fun. But still it appears to be a good long distance cruiser and most important a fantastic daily driver.
Last edited: