Taycan 4S with uPdate vs Taycan 4S without range test

npx

Well-Known Member
First Name
Justin
Joined
Jan 26, 2022
Threads
5
Messages
204
Reaction score
136
Location
Cupertino, CA
Vehicles
2020 Taycan Turbo
Country flag
Unless I missed something, sounds like they found about a 3 percent efficiency difference. That's promising. Minimal, but it's nice to see porsche putting effort in and fine tuning post-sales even for cars that are approaching 3 years old.
 

DennisVR

Member
First Name
Dennis
Joined
Apr 1, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
6
Reaction score
7
Location
Belgum
Vehicles
997s (Taycan 4S ordered)
It's more than 3%. They both started at 95%, the updated Taycan had 25% left the pre-update Taycan 22% => +4% difference.

Also the pano roof on the updated Taycan can be a factor as that's around 30kg weight difference.
 
Last edited:

whitex

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2021
Threads
13
Messages
1,129
Reaction score
752
Location
WA, USA
Vehicles
2 x Tesla Model S, waiting for CTT allocation
Country flag
One of the cars had a manual vs. motorized charge port which blocks the air-scarf vent, causing it to be potentially another 1% less efficient.
 

f1eng

Well-Known Member
First Name
Frank
Joined
Aug 19, 2021
Threads
14
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
1,636
Location
Oxfordshire, UK
Vehicles
Ferrari F355 spider, Mercedes 500E, Toyota Prius P
Country flag
Road tests are a pretty pointless way of doing a real comparison, really.
Lab testing will reveal the real gains in efficiency of the drive train and electrical system and I am sure Porsche are gaining knowledge on the hardware all the time.

I had been surprised they went toi the rear motor from the front but since the rear has a higher gear maybe it runs at a more efficient RPM than the front (both must be turning anyway since there is no clutch).
 

 
Signature Wheel
Top