Yep...agreed. Thanks for sharing that early Pano pic.......had not seen it for a long time.Nope - it will be basically what we've seen with the 'mules' with the headlights uncovered. Here is an early spy shot of the Panamera:
They just don't change radically from the late-stage test cars because everything is pretty much set, and all they can do is throw some covering onto the body.
The silhouette on my Macan packaging resembled the Macan's shape almost identically. The Taycan stuff looks pretty close to the mules, however, I think that the front fenders will be slightly different than what we've been seeing in testing. Also, remember that proper wheels and attributes can change the look of a car dramatically.Nope - it will be basically what we've seen with the 'mules' with the headlights uncovered. Here is an early spy shot of the Panamera:
They just don't change radically from the late-stage test cars because everything is pretty much set, and all they can do is throw some covering onto the body.
Nice observations.... For me it's the low hood and high fender arches which defined the look of the Mission E, and what I miss most after seeing the prototypes.For what it's worth....and this is not my list.....but others have done graphic silhouette comparos of the E body to the mule body.....and these were some of the observations:
·Roof line is definitely different......the front window rake is different
·The whole front profile of the car is has been flattened, now more ‘practical’. Lost is the very low front bonnet and the curvy high, 918-like, fender arches as well as the more pronounced hood ridges on what now appears to be a conventional hood
·Side-view profile of rear is definitely different
·The view from the rear is very different…..they’ve significantly toned down the broad shoulders over the rears, unfortunate
·Of course, we have a conventional B pillar and no suicides
But the prototype of the 918 was almost 1:1 to the production version.Nope - it will be basically what we've seen with the 'mules' with the headlights uncovered. Here is an early spy shot of the Panamera:
They just don't change radically from the late-stage test cars because everything is pretty much set, and all they can do is throw some covering onto the body.
Boy I sure hope they are wrong! All those changes make it more like a Pano. If that is the case I will just keep the Pano TTS I already have. Why change if the there is not a radical styling upgrade. I am only half there on EVs all things considered.For what it's worth....and this is not my list.....but others have done graphic silhouette comparos of the E body to the mule body.....and these were some of the observations:
·Roof line is definitely different......the front window rake is different
·The whole front profile of the car is has been flattened, now more ‘practical’. Lost is the very low front bonnet and the curvy high, 918-like, fender arches as well as the more pronounced hood ridges on what now appears to be a conventional hood
·Side-view profile of rear is definitely different
·The view from the rear is very different…..they’ve significantly toned down the broad shoulders over the rears, unfortunate
·Of course, we have a conventional B pillar and no suicides
Interesting comments, I missed this. Unfortunately "very similar" is also subjective and seen through the lens of production/safety/bean counting practicalities as far as these suits go.Still, Oliver Blume stated that the production version will stay very close to the prototype which was presented in 2015.
https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/18/...ion-e-tesla-model-s-competitor-electric-price
But the teaser images of the production Taycan do indeed show a car which is almost indistinguishable from the concept. It won't have the suicide doors, but there's no reason to believe that the proportions won't be the same or very similar - for instance, I believe the Taycan will have a height of 1.3m, just like the concept. I believe the overall width will also be the same as a Mission E. The 2020 911 has a height of 1.3m, and this is more along the lines of a four-door supercar rather than an average saloon.Interesting comments, I missed this. Unfortunately "very similar" is also subjective and seen through the lens of production/safety/bean counting practicalities as far as these suits go.
The exactly proportions of the Taycan are:But the teaser images of the production Taycan do indeed show a car which is almost indistinguishable from the concept. It won't have the suicide doors, but there's no reason to believe that the proportions won't be the same or very similar - for instance, I believe the Taycan will have a height of 1.3m, just like the concept. I believe the overall width will also be the same as a Mission E. The 2020 911 has a height of 1.3m, and this is more along the lines of a four-door supercar rather than an average saloon.
Sweet, any idea what the width of the Taycan is? Is it wider than the Mission E?The exactly proportions of the Taycan are:
height: 1,38
length: 4,96
Best Regards
It means he’s not fully sold on the idea of owning/using an EV.What does that even mean?