Porsche Taycan GT Spied Virtually Undisguised, Insider Claims It Has 1,000+ HP

[nfoxtrot]

https://www.motor1.com/news/686424/porsche-taycan-gt-spy-shots/

Things I noticed:
- Larger tail lights I assume to address concerns they are not noticeable enough and could be a safety hazard according to some posts I've seen here

- Air vents in rear bumper presumably to relieve some pressure being built-up in the rear bumper or to further cool the braking system

- I still don't like the new headlights however the "tear drop" area is an improvement for me personally

- Obviously a substantial wing in the back with a small lip on the trunk

- New trimming around car similar to the off road design package

Sponsored

 

[DougFrisk]

If that's the visual refresh I'm glad we purchased an outdated one. Is it just me or does it look like they've cribbed the "pouty lip" front bumper styling Tesla has on everything?

 

[nfoxtrot]

I agree, not a fan and hoping this is just for the GT. I'm currently waitlisted for a CT and would love to not have this front end.

 

[007]

And no drivers side charging port.

 

[nfoxtrot]

How did I not notice that??

It's just a test mule, It's just a test mule, It's just a test mule

 

[mutanthands]

I suspect some of this will just apply to the GT trim.

I don't mind the headlights (controversially), but the teardrop area is looking a little too Audi E-Tron.
The rear with the extra wheel vents is starting to look messy, and the spoiler really doesn't work on this car.

Not bad, and some nice nip / tucks, but I think I prefer the current Taycan design overall.

 

[Archimedes]

That wing looks ridiculous on that car. All it needs now is some neon colors and a VTEC sticker on the bumper.

 

[Crazymind]

And no drivers side charging port.

passenger side, passenger mate.

 

[satchurator]

Are we referring to the wedge shaped cutouts beneath the headlights as the teardrops? I'm super disappointed with those. Would need to see in the flesh but from these and previous images I'm not sure I would upgrade my CT4 to this refresh.

 

[Mr.Smith]

I assume this will be a $300k car.

 

[LongLive959]

Argyle > plaid

 

[007]

I assume this will be a $300k car.

Turbo S price is already hard to swallow… I don’t see them selling many of these in the high $200k’s.

Plus that awful wing… not on a sedan.

 

[Mr.Smith]

Turbo S price is already hard to swallow… I don’t see them selling many of these in the high $200k’s.

Plus that awful wing… not on a sedan.

A well optioned Turbo S is $225k. For those performance numbers, it makes sense in the high $200, $300k range.

Sponsored