Berkelinho
New Member
- First Name
- Jason
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2024
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Vehicles
- 2018 BMW 340i
- Thread starter
- #1
Hi everyone,
I hope to be part of the Taycan family soon. I've been looking at different models for the past few weeks and am currently torn between two choices. I'm interested to know which choice you guys would make, and why.
Both cars are iceblue metallic, which looks sick IMO. They both have the performance plus battery, chrono sport package, BOSE sound system, interior light design and panoramic roof. Car #1 however, has a lot more options on top of that. ACC with Innodrive, lane assist, comfort acces, park assistent with the surround view, heated seats in the front and back, ventilated seats in the front and a heated steering wheel. Car #2 has none of that, BUT it has a the exterior sport design package and the ice blue Porsche logo on the rear (this looks amazing in combination with the paint job), and the passenger display on the interior.
On paper, car #1 is the better equipped car. It's even 5K cheaper compared to car #2. The BIG but, is the mileage. Car #1 has driven 56.000 miles, whereas car #2 'only' has 25.500 miles. The battery of both cars are still under warrenty. Car #1 has three years or warrenty left, and car #2 a little over four years. Both cars look splendid on the outside, but you can clearly see some wear and tear on the inside of car #1. It's clear this has been used a lot more.
I plan to use this as my daily driver for the next 3-4 years. I drive between 6.000-9.000 miles on a yearly basis.
So, would you rather go for a better spec'd out car with more mileage, or go for a simpler version with less miles?
I hope to be part of the Taycan family soon. I've been looking at different models for the past few weeks and am currently torn between two choices. I'm interested to know which choice you guys would make, and why.
Both cars are iceblue metallic, which looks sick IMO. They both have the performance plus battery, chrono sport package, BOSE sound system, interior light design and panoramic roof. Car #1 however, has a lot more options on top of that. ACC with Innodrive, lane assist, comfort acces, park assistent with the surround view, heated seats in the front and back, ventilated seats in the front and a heated steering wheel. Car #2 has none of that, BUT it has a the exterior sport design package and the ice blue Porsche logo on the rear (this looks amazing in combination with the paint job), and the passenger display on the interior.
On paper, car #1 is the better equipped car. It's even 5K cheaper compared to car #2. The BIG but, is the mileage. Car #1 has driven 56.000 miles, whereas car #2 'only' has 25.500 miles. The battery of both cars are still under warrenty. Car #1 has three years or warrenty left, and car #2 a little over four years. Both cars look splendid on the outside, but you can clearly see some wear and tear on the inside of car #1. It's clear this has been used a lot more.
I plan to use this as my daily driver for the next 3-4 years. I drive between 6.000-9.000 miles on a yearly basis.
So, would you rather go for a better spec'd out car with more mileage, or go for a simpler version with less miles?
Sponsored