Both absolutely correct.Fear sells insurance. The theories remain that:
1. everything most likely and/or known to fail has already failed and/or been repaired or replaced under warranty already; and
2. the business of selling extended warranties is not a charity. In fact, its run by quants and actuaries who set the purchase premium above the cost of the expected repairs.
I second that!Both absolutely correct.
But it means little when you fall on the wrong side of statistics and get walloped with a 4-figure bill ?
I've never bothered to date with extended warranties on all sorts of cars... But am pretty sure I will be on the Taycan. The annual cost isn't horrendous, the downside could well be.
While I will easily agree with this for any other car it doesn’t ring true for the Taycan in my experience. Have seen 8 years insurance policies for this car for 5-6k being talked about on this board. Pretty much any failure on the taycan will be more than this. The high voltage charger will almost certainly go out and that’s an easy 8k bill. Mine has been replaced four times now. One thing people forget is techs and Porsche do not have a full grasp on the repair for these vehicles. It’s mainly throwing parts at the problem to see if it fixes it. With a lot of times not actually fixing the root cause. That gets very expensive really quick if it’s out of your pocket. Then you have the fact that only Porsche can service the vehicle so you are stuck with extremely high labor and parts cost.^ Amen to #2 in particular! If a Taycan owner just doesn’t like the feeling of being presented with big repair bills, then sure, get an extended warranty. Ditto for the especially risk-averse. But self-insuring against repair bills ends up costing far less over an entire adult car-owning lifespan (unless hit with extraordinary bad luck). And if a Taycan owner can’t afford to self-insure against repairs, then owning a Taycan probably isn’t such a good idea.
What you forget in #2 is that the math for Porsche/insurers is quite different than for the individual. Their risk calculation goes against their entire fleet and they can even afford a loss on the Taycan making it up with the more reliable models. Equally important, their cost structure is very different from the individual Taycan owner. Porsche will be able to replace an OBC at sourcing cost plus labor at cost while the Taycan owner will pay a hefty multiple of that. I have never seen a more clear cut case for buying an extended warranty than with the Taycan but if the OP is not convinced, I am very interested to see how the assumption of zero problems on this high tech car works out.^ Amen to #2 in particular! If a Taycan owner just doesn’t like the feeling of being presented with big repair bills, then sure, get an extended warranty. Ditto for the especially risk-averse. But self-insuring against repair bills ends up costing far less over an entire adult car-owning lifespan (unless hit with extraordinary bad luck). And if a Taycan owner can’t afford to self-insure against repairs, then owning a Taycan probably isn’t such a good idea.
Fully agree.Fear sells insurance. The theories remain that:
1. everything most likely and/or known to fail has already failed and/or been repaired or replaced under warranty already; and
2. the business of selling extended warranties is not a charity. In fact, its run by quants and actuaries who set the purchase premium above the cost of the expected repairs.
If you forum search for 'extended warranty' in titles only, you will find lots of threads with info related to your question.Now I also do have my own question, if you guys get extended warranty, do you just call Porsche to get it or do you seek some kind of third party insurance company? And is there an pricing advantage of getting it when you purchase the car because dealership make more money if you by the warranty and you can pressure them to a lower selling price?
Excellent points too and these points make it even harder to make a decision but thanks anyway. ???My 2cents because I'm in the market of a CPO Taycan as well. I usually tell people to avoid any insurance on things they can afford to lose.
1) Because insurance is a form of risk of transfer with additional cost. Meaning that, you can not bear the consequence of something, so you pay someone to take that risk.
2) And since the insurer is usually in business of taking risk, they usually have way more data and expertise to make sure they not only mathematically losing money.
3) And if they do screw up their pricing consistently, they would be out of business soon and you will be left with no insurance anyway.
With that said. I'm not so sure that the same 2 and 3 stands for Taycan in particular. Because:
a)For 2): EV is still a relative new type of car, Taycan in particular is even newer, the earliest car is only 4 years old, just out of their factory warrant. So the insurer have 0 data just as rest of us. In fact, I would sometime argue that owner like us who constantly roaming this forum and research on the car has a better idea of the reliability of this particular vehicle then some corporate employee who needs to manage many different makes and model, have no direct knowledge of the car, have very little data to go with and have to make a pricing on a short deadline.
b)For 3) According to the statistic, Taycan seems to be almost like an outlier in terms of how unreliable it is. So although the insurer may lose money on Taycan contracts, but they should be well off with other cars especially on the sports ones. After all, Boxster and Cayman are statistically among the most reliable cars. So they would probably still honor the contract.
c)It stands that Taycan seems to be almost prohibitable expensive to repair because how integrated things are, how limited experience tech and the fact that all repair has to be done through Porsche authorized dealership. And I would argue that if the extended warranty is backed a Porsche affiliated org, they would have cost advantage over us inidviduals?