f1eng
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Frank
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2021
- Threads
- 48
- Messages
- 4,765
- Reaction score
- 8,335
- Location
- Oxfordshire, UK
- Vehicles
- Taycan CT4S, Ferrari 355, Merc 500E, Prius PHV
The difference between Iron and composite brakes on a F1 car is just weight, not unsprung (that made no difference) but just weight, the lap time gain is entirely just the weight saving, 10kg lighter is around 0.35 secs per lap quicker wherever the weight comes from and composite brakes are well worth it for that. The reduction in rotational inertia is very small, Inertia is totally dominated by the tyre.I’d put that point in a similar category of misunderstanding as carbon ceramic brakes; where the primary benefit is reducing unsprung mass and reducing rotating mass. I’m sure someone will say that they have better high temp resistance, which is true, but your daily driver isn’t an F1 car.
Compared to Iron composite are less consistent when cold and at high temperature just wear quickly or catch fire (they are just high tech coal really) rather than fail due to cracking or fluid boiling.
Sponsored