ciaranob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2021
- Threads
- 83
- Messages
- 3,547
- Reaction score
- 2,639
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Vehicles
- CT4S 2022 Mini Cooper S 2024 Electric in 2025/6
- Thread starter
- #271
I guess from my perspective the point here for me was that for all the negative comments about the 'flash' SoH reading we get fro the OBDII tools (and with ALL the provisos as to what we are actually measuring etc aside) the difference between a deep 5 day SoH test and the flash reading was in the end 2%!Interesting information, but TeslaBjorn already has done a lot of similar tests, and his test compared yo this companies was not far off either. He also tested this tool earlier and gave his comments. And I have a lot of respect for TeslaBjorn and his tests
Wht I find much more interesting though is his comment about the Porsche service having done a test and been ble to give him detailed information. According to @Archimedes in a post, his valued service guy was not able to provide such info Via their tools???
In the Baseline SoH thread we've repeatedly stated that these OBDII readings basically are by default +/-1% and with some clear examples of varying to 2%. What we don't have to my knowledge is a comparable measure of error/std deviation for that companies deep testing (nor for that matter from Porsche's own deep testing - correct?).
So again, irrespective of statistical robustness, the general trends we're seeing from the OBDII data on this forum are likely not massively off (imo) and as I said before, at some point we can possibly derive a value to bulk shift to be inline with more robust deep tests but suspect we'll likely never get access to enough of that data - hence why the OBDII data are somewhat useful again as a substitute.
PS: I've listened to a lot of Bjorn's monologues too
Sponsored