or1
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- O
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2019
- Threads
- 10
- Messages
- 289
- Reaction score
- 543
- Location
- Norway
- Vehicles
- Taycan GTS ST
- Thread starter
- #1
I am far from an expert on this. What I can try to describe is what I think and feel. But I cannot exclude that much of it is imagination: “it is a Porsche, it should drive better”.
There is one aspect that is definitely real, however, although the judgment is subjective: electric sport sound. I appreciate very much being able turn it off, as I can do in the Taycan and not in the RS. I don’t have to listen all the time to what in the RS seems like wheel bearings going bad. Having all sounds with “natural” causes is good, whether they are telling that all is OK or something is wrong. There is interesting life in the natural EV sounds: wheels, motors, gears, wind. It is not as brutal as with ICE, if someone wants to compare with that, but what about refinement instead? The relative silence of driving electric appeals to me, and a fake sound is subtracting from that experience.
Another theme is drive modes. The RS goes into Comfort when started, and it is a few button presses to switch mode. And the difference between Comfort and Dynamic is not that big to me, so I mostly left it in Comfort. Why they don’t allow the car to remember a mode choice is beyond me - it would be a very easy way to let most drivers be happier.
The Taycan always starts in Normal, alas no memory there either. But the other modes are so much easier to set with the small knob in the steering wheel, that I actually do it. I prefer Individual, with Sport as the basis, chassis height mid (some bad roads around here, and the efficiency difference is not important) - and sound off of course.
I should also note that I don’t have rear wheel steering on these cars. The improvement in turning radius is too small to matter to me, living in the Norwegian countryside. My speed is often 50 to 80 km/h where the effect may not be quite clear. It would have been another thing to break, too. But what matters most is winter driving. I want to know that if the back end goes kind of sideways, it is because of a slippery road, not a steering action. I don’t do track days either. I am not sure that my choice was wise, but think it works well and I don’t miss rear wheel steering.
Final caveat: this report is for 20” wheels with winter tires, Hakkapelliitta R3 on the Taycan. It will have Mission E 21” in summer, but it’s a while until that.
To me, the comfort level of the Taycan in Normal mode is at least on par with the RS in Comfort. Most bumps are absorbed rather well. (The weight of the cars must have something to do with this.) But the Taycan is not as hard going into a bump, then firmer in its response afterwards and finishes them off more quickly, while the RS tries to be softer after them and they last longer in a way. I prefer the Taycan.
In road holding and attitude I feel the Taycan more planted. The steering is where there is the largest difference to me. The RS understeers, the Taycan rather not. When I turn the RS steering wheel, the car goes there with precision and without fuss (in speeds and turns that don’t stress it much), but there is very little resistance in the wheel even though I feel the car has its own resistance to the direction change. In the Taycan, on the other hand, the resistance I feel in the steering wheel is kind of a direct image of the car’s resistance. I also feel that the Taycan is even more stable at higher speeds.
It is as if the Taycan is more ready to do twists and turns. I know very little about horses, but can try a comparison (the Taycan is marketed with horse associations…). The RS is a dependable, strong, conscientious horse that does what it is guided to, and is easy to operate on long journeys with comfort. But it does not show any enthusiasm for its work. The GTS is equally dependable and strong, but adds that bit of enthusiasm: it wants to do the turns, and it plays well with more involvement from the driver.
This may be my own imagination. I would be very much interested in hearing other drivers’ thoughts. But as you understand, maybe except for some long trips where not being so “involved” in the driving is preferable, I think the Taycan is a clearly better experience.
But does it have a “soul”? Actually, that is a word I would reserve for other types of creatures. But maybe Porsche’s intention is to say that their cars have personalities, and more so than other cars. I will not argue against that. Also, although I have not driven a 911 (yet), in no way can I see why a car needs an ICE engine to have a personality. Driving a good EV is a fine experience, albeit different. And driving a Taycan attentively is even more of a good experience than driving an RS e-tron GT.
There is one aspect that is definitely real, however, although the judgment is subjective: electric sport sound. I appreciate very much being able turn it off, as I can do in the Taycan and not in the RS. I don’t have to listen all the time to what in the RS seems like wheel bearings going bad. Having all sounds with “natural” causes is good, whether they are telling that all is OK or something is wrong. There is interesting life in the natural EV sounds: wheels, motors, gears, wind. It is not as brutal as with ICE, if someone wants to compare with that, but what about refinement instead? The relative silence of driving electric appeals to me, and a fake sound is subtracting from that experience.
Another theme is drive modes. The RS goes into Comfort when started, and it is a few button presses to switch mode. And the difference between Comfort and Dynamic is not that big to me, so I mostly left it in Comfort. Why they don’t allow the car to remember a mode choice is beyond me - it would be a very easy way to let most drivers be happier.
The Taycan always starts in Normal, alas no memory there either. But the other modes are so much easier to set with the small knob in the steering wheel, that I actually do it. I prefer Individual, with Sport as the basis, chassis height mid (some bad roads around here, and the efficiency difference is not important) - and sound off of course.
I should also note that I don’t have rear wheel steering on these cars. The improvement in turning radius is too small to matter to me, living in the Norwegian countryside. My speed is often 50 to 80 km/h where the effect may not be quite clear. It would have been another thing to break, too. But what matters most is winter driving. I want to know that if the back end goes kind of sideways, it is because of a slippery road, not a steering action. I don’t do track days either. I am not sure that my choice was wise, but think it works well and I don’t miss rear wheel steering.
Final caveat: this report is for 20” wheels with winter tires, Hakkapelliitta R3 on the Taycan. It will have Mission E 21” in summer, but it’s a while until that.
To me, the comfort level of the Taycan in Normal mode is at least on par with the RS in Comfort. Most bumps are absorbed rather well. (The weight of the cars must have something to do with this.) But the Taycan is not as hard going into a bump, then firmer in its response afterwards and finishes them off more quickly, while the RS tries to be softer after them and they last longer in a way. I prefer the Taycan.
In road holding and attitude I feel the Taycan more planted. The steering is where there is the largest difference to me. The RS understeers, the Taycan rather not. When I turn the RS steering wheel, the car goes there with precision and without fuss (in speeds and turns that don’t stress it much), but there is very little resistance in the wheel even though I feel the car has its own resistance to the direction change. In the Taycan, on the other hand, the resistance I feel in the steering wheel is kind of a direct image of the car’s resistance. I also feel that the Taycan is even more stable at higher speeds.
It is as if the Taycan is more ready to do twists and turns. I know very little about horses, but can try a comparison (the Taycan is marketed with horse associations…). The RS is a dependable, strong, conscientious horse that does what it is guided to, and is easy to operate on long journeys with comfort. But it does not show any enthusiasm for its work. The GTS is equally dependable and strong, but adds that bit of enthusiasm: it wants to do the turns, and it plays well with more involvement from the driver.
This may be my own imagination. I would be very much interested in hearing other drivers’ thoughts. But as you understand, maybe except for some long trips where not being so “involved” in the driving is preferable, I think the Taycan is a clearly better experience.
But does it have a “soul”? Actually, that is a word I would reserve for other types of creatures. But maybe Porsche’s intention is to say that their cars have personalities, and more so than other cars. I will not argue against that. Also, although I have not driven a 911 (yet), in no way can I see why a car needs an ICE engine to have a personality. Driving a good EV is a fine experience, albeit different. And driving a Taycan attentively is even more of a good experience than driving an RS e-tron GT.
Sponsored