I was reading through all the posts here - https://www.taycanforum.com/forum/threads/fitcamx-dashcam-installation.7253/ [edit - fixed the link]Curios why you eliminated the fitcam?
It certainly looks the best by miles and the only one i've seen where i might vaguely consider doing it myself. Why on earth doesn't porsche fit their own like this?I went with a FitCamX. Plug and play 20 minute job.
https://fitcamx.com/products/fitcamx-dash-cam-for-porsche
We're gunna need a bigger liquidiser .
I had one of those - my wife's less than a year old $100K car was totaled by a drive drifting from their lane and PIT maneuvering my wife. The rear footage could clearly proved to insurance who was at fault. Without it, you could try to get experts to analyze the front to show you were in your lane when hit (if you have audio), but that would take taking it to trial and paying experts to testify, and of course the judge or jury to be convinced. Rear cam is a must for me.However, the footage on this thread showing someone being tagged on a motorway from the rear, it could easily be argued by the guilty party that it was the front car's who drifted across lanes without the footage.
Thanks. Over here that sort of thing would rarely go to court, unless an injury/police were involved and wanted to prosecute something. What does happen ultimately is the insurers would sort it out between themselves and in most cases where there are contradictory arguments (i imagine) agree to split the claim, which equates to everyones no claims bonus/record getting tarnished.I had one of those - my wife's less than a year old $100K car was totaled by a drive drifting from their lane and PIT maneuvering my wife. The rear footage could clearly proved to insurance who was at fault. Without it, you could try to get experts to analyze the front to show you were in your lane when hit (if you have audio), but that would take taking it to trial and paying experts to testify, and of course the judge or jury to be convinced. Rear cam is a must for me.
Same here. You'd have to take the other party to court yourself, at your own cost, then if you win, you could go back to your insurance to change the fault attribution. In the example I was talking about, the insurer was honest to tell me that without the dashcam footage it would have been ruled "no fault", meaning "equal fault", which translates to both drivers getting dinged on future insurance premiums (but no traffic tickets).Over here that sort of thing would rarely go to court, unless an injury/police were involved and wanted to prosecute something. What does happen ultimately is the insurers would sort it out between themselves and in most cases where there are contradictory arguments (i imagine) agree to split the claim, which equates to everyones no claims bonus/record getting tarnished.
I have the 900X and it is hardwired into the passenger footwell fuse box. It will auto turn off if the batter drops below settings you define in the app. The older Blackvue had a separate battery pack that you could install. Called the PowerMagic battery.As a fellow cockney, could i ask where you got it fitted / how much it cost? I've absolutely no interest in trying to DIY one.
Ta
Rob.
Installed myself. It is pretty easy and you know it is placed exactly where you want the cameras and the wires are hidden. Took me a couple of ours and $11 interior trim tool kit from Harbour Freight.I'm leaning towards this too now, or the Viofo. I think I've eliminated the FitCam from contention...
Also trying to figure out installer. Do people just go to audio shops?
Not this person, but I did land on the Thinkware U3000- my rationale was it seems similar to the BlackVue, but uses a better camera and has some sort of optimized parking mode where it uses lower power and turns on the camera based on radar.Was wondering if you made a decision. I'm deciding between the DR970X and the FitcamX.