f1eng
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Frank
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2021
- Threads
- 48
- Messages
- 4,769
- Reaction score
- 8,340
- Location
- Oxfordshire, UK
- Vehicles
- Taycan CT4S, Ferrari 355, Merc 500E, Prius PHV
I shan't buy one but it is the only turbocharged car I would ever consider because the turbo with co-axial motor/generator is the only way, yet, to get reasonably low lag from a turbo engine.Hi all
Drove a 992.2 4GTS last week and cannot get it out of my mind. It’s beautiful, handles well, sounds fantastic and is
very quick, it’s got under my skin. It picks up really well but not quite at full electric levels. Once it’s going it really goes. I’ve got an allocation for a GTS4. It’s not cheap and might be the next Porsche to experience high depreciation but my heart wants one. Would you change your very highly specced J1.1 4s that you’ve already taken all the depreciation on for one?
Having written that AFAIK the only use of such a turbo has been in racing, the MGU-H in Formula 1 is such a device and it has actually been dropped from the 2026 engine spec "because it is too expensive for road car use" ie whilst it may be OK at 911GTS prices (and then it is really expensive...) but will never be cheap enough for mass production, even though it largely solves the biggest problem of turbo engines.
So if I were to buy another IC engined car (I have a couple still) it would have to be normally aspirated or this latest 911 GTS, any other turbo is unacceptable when not flat out IMO.
After a lifetime spent in motor sport engineering I realised fairly soon the biggest shortcoming of IC engines (power is dependant on air flow) has never been solved because it is inherent, so never could be.
IC engines are great for racing and track days, for a road car not good enough IMO.
If you want a 911 it is the best outside an unobtanium GT3.
Sponsored