charliemathilde
Well-Known Member
Dave‘s right. There’s no improvement in stopping distance with CC until enough repeated applications to induce fade. Any of the Porsche brakes are capable of exceeding the tire’s grip, easily. And the Porsche steel brakes are pretty overkill for public street driving, even at autobahn speeds. Because high speed public street driving doesn’t include multiple emergency stops every minute the way track braking would.Defenately the brakes, are you kidding me?
It's the most crucial factor in transferring kinetic energy into heat.
CCs do that much better.
It's a balanced combination of tires and brakes.
Tires for transferring the kinetic energy to the brakes (grip).
Brakes for transferring kinetic energy into friction (heat).
CCs can transfer much more energy per cm2.
That's far before the point of fading.
And with 2500kg of EV you'll need every bit of stopping power.
I won't go along with you into that direction where you think that steel brakes are as good as CCs, that's just not true.
Besides, on CCs you can put much more pressure on the pads than you can with steel brakes, hence the bigger stopping power.
this topic is pretty well covered. CC don’t stop better, although on smaller cars they do weigh less unsprung. You can entertain yourself with YouTube tests comparing them.
Sponsored